Pakistan & Gulf Economist
  • Home
  • THIS WEEK
    • Cover Stories
    • Research
    • Finance
    • Economy
    • Energy
    • Market
    • Editorial
    • Textile
    • Information Technology
    • Transportation
    • Agriculture & Horticulture
  • Interviews
  • Research
  • In The News
  • Stocks Analysis
  • PAGE Reports
  • Archives Editions
    • Previous Editions
    • Archive Articles 2021
    • Archive Articles 2020
    • Archives Articles 2019
    • Archives Articles 2018
    • Archives Articles 2017
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Pakistan & Gulf Economist
Monday, June 27
  • Home
  • THIS WEEK
    • Cover Stories
    • Research
    • Finance
    • Economy
    • Energy
    • Market
    • Editorial
    • Textile
    • Information Technology
    • Transportation
    • Agriculture & Horticulture
  • Interviews
  • Research
  • In The News
  • Stocks Analysis
  • PAGE Reports
  • Archives Editions
    • Previous Editions
    • Archive Articles 2021
    • Archive Articles 2020
    • Archives Articles 2019
    • Archives Articles 2018
    • Archives Articles 2017
Pakistan & Gulf Economist
Home»General Interest»Eco-friendly tech comes with its own environmental costs: that’s why it’s vital to cut energy demand now
General Interest

Eco-friendly tech comes with its own environmental costs: that’s why it’s vital to cut energy demand now

By PAGEJune 17, 2022Updated:June 17, 2022No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Eco-friendly tech comes with its own environmental costs that’s why it’s vital to cut energy demand now

Mining and extracting metals has ecologically damaging consequences. Shutterstock

Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Written By

Timothy Laing, University of Brighton


If we want to keep global temperature rise below 1.5 or even 2℃, we’ll need a monumental shift in how our energy and transport systems work. The International Energy Agency has declared that millions of solar panels, wind turbines and electric vehicles (EVs) will need to be made and deployed around the world in the next three decades. Thankfully, these technologies are constantly improving – as well as becoming cheaper.

However, a key feature of most eco-friendly tech is that it requires more, and more varied, materials than those used in the tech it’s replacing. Wind turbines need iron and zinc for the corrosion-proof steel and motors needed to capture energy from the wind. And electric vehicles need lithium, cobalt, nickel and manganese for their batteries, plus neodymium and other rare earth materials for their motors.

White cars charging electrically from charging points mounted on grey frames
Electric vehicles require rare materials to run.
Shutterstock

 

Building lots of these devices will therefore require huge amounts of specific materials, many of which are difficult to mine. Some can come from recycling, but for many materials, such as lithium, there’s just not enough being used today that can be recycled for future use. Instead, most will have to come from mining.

This means that if low-carbon tech is to be used around the world, we need to face the less palatable consequences, or trade-offs, of building it. Making a global switch to EVs, for example, may mean damaging forest ecosystems to access lithium or cobalt.

Trade-offs

One major trade-off is the environmental damage associated with mining and refining materials. An example is aluminium, vital for making solar panel frames. Worldwide aluminium production accounts for 2% of all greenhouse gas emissions, with studies estimating future emissions could reach 1.7 gigatonnes of CO₂ by 2050 – equivalent to twice the annual emissions from planes.

There’s potential to cut these emissions significantly, however. Switching the source of electricity for processing aluminium from fossil fuels to hydroelectric can reduce emissions from new aluminium by around 75%. What’s needed to make that happen, though, are better financial incentives for the mining sector to use renewable energy.

Brine pools for lithium mining
Brine extraction has uncertain consequences.
Shutterstock

 

Difficulties with sourcing these materials are not limited to the emissions they create. Extracting lithium from brine – as is done in Argentina, Bolivia and Chile – requires drilling holes in salt flats to bring brine (salt water) to the surface, then evaporating the water using sunlight to leave potassium, manganese, borax and lithium salts behind.

There is a debate about the extent to which this brine qualifies as water, and therefore how much its extraction is affecting water-stressed regions like Chile. For those arguing that it should be classed as water, its extraction is creating unnecessary water scarcity and damaging fragile ecosystems. And even from the perspective of those arguing it’s not water due to its high concentration of minerals, the long-term consequences of its extraction remain unknown.

Cobalt, another vital material used in EV batteries, is mostly mined in the Democratic Republic of Congo. A large but unknown quantity of cobalt is extracted by small-scale miners who often employ children and have been accused of unsafe working conditions, poor safety records and exploitative employment contracts.

These trade-offs are not a justification for avoiding action on climate change, nor for refusing to build the tech we need to decarbonise essential systems. They do, however, justify closer focus on how the materials needed to make eco-friendlier tech are sourced.

A person holds a sign reading '#FreeCongo End Child Mining'
Mining can have socially devastating consequences.
Shutterstock

 

Improving recycling of old products and scrap materials is a crucial part of this. However, the sheer increase in demand for these materials, due to the ongoing low-carbon transition as well as consumers’ growing wealth across the world, means this alone probably won’t be enough to avoid widespread ecosystem damage.

To help reduce this demand, we must increase the energy efficiency of our homes and businesses so they require less energy in the first place. Shifting away from private transport by investing in public transport will also help to cut mining demand. Without such action, achieving a truly sustainable low-carbon transition will be impossible.

The Conversation


Written By

Timothy Laing, Senior Lecturer in Economics, University of Brighton

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

climate change Ecosystem energy EVs IEA
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleThis is how to accelerate the move from coal to renewables in emerging markets
Next Article Here’s how digitalization is helping to transform the creative industries
PAGE

Related Posts

Alternate Energy and Pakistan Scenario

June 27, 2022

Acute economic crises yet solution is a piece of cake

June 27, 2022

Advocating sustainably for a sustainable future

June 27, 2022

Leave A Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

subsfwebfinal
PAGE RATE CARD
ADVERTISEMENTS THIS WEEK
Post Budget 2022 - 2023
DIAMOND SUPREME FOAM
https://www.pakistangulfeconomist.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/VID-20220329-WA0015.mp4
blog-bannernew
tourism-bannernew
Previous Editions
© 2022 Designed & Developed By Pakistan & Gulf Economist.
  • Digital Edition
  • Print Edition
  • Print + Digital Edition
  • PDF Edition

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Go to mobile version