Pakistan & Gulf Economist
  • Home
  • THIS WEEK
    • Cover Stories
    • Research
    • Finance
    • Economy
    • Energy
    • Market
    • Editorial
    • Textile
    • Information Technology
    • Insurance
    • Transportation
    • Agriculture & Horticulture
  • Research
  • In The News
  • Interviews
  • Stocks Analysis
  • PAGE Reports
  • Archives Editions
    • Previous Editions
    • Archive Articles 2022
    • Archive Articles 2021
    • Archive Articles 2020
    • Archives Articles 2019
    • Archives Articles 2018
    • Archives Articles 2017
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Facebook Instagram
Pakistan & Gulf Economist
Friday, June 2
  • Home
  • THIS WEEK
    • Cover Stories
    • Research
    • Finance
    • Economy
    • Energy
    • Market
    • Editorial
    • Textile
    • Information Technology
    • Insurance
    • Transportation
    • Agriculture & Horticulture
  • Research
  • In The News
  • Interviews
  • Stocks Analysis
  • PAGE Reports
  • Archives Editions
    • Previous Editions
    • Archive Articles 2022
    • Archive Articles 2021
    • Archive Articles 2020
    • Archives Articles 2019
    • Archives Articles 2018
    • Archives Articles 2017
Pakistan & Gulf Economist
Home»General Interest»Here’s why infrastructure will make or break our response to climate change
General Interest

Here’s why infrastructure will make or break our response to climate change

By AdminPAGESeptember 23, 2019Updated:September 24, 2019No Comments4 Mins Read
Here’s why infrastructure will make or break our response to climate change

To address climate change we will need more and better mass transit to get people out of their cars.Image: REUTERS/Ralph Orlowski

Facebook Email

[box type=”info” align=”” class=”” width=””]Joel Moser Founder and CEO, Aquamarine Investment Partners

This article is part of the Sustainable Development Impact Summit[/box]

The public discourse about climate change and infrastructure often treats these two issues as separate. It’s time to start thinking about them as the same thing. Many of the solutions to the climate change crisis are about infrastructure choices, as infrastructure development can either advance our progress in addressing climate change or damage it.

Climate change activists often lose traction when they seem to be calling for individual action – drive less, fly less, eat less meat – when in fact only collective action will make a difference.

Addressing climate change will take massive international action, country by country, and the tools are clear: carbon taxes to provide pricing indicators that shape behaviour, and physical infrastructure that facilitates and shapes behaviour, in the right way.

Government leaders around the world talk about infrastructure as though it’s all good and we need a lot more of it. They are only half correct. After World War II, the United States built a vast interstate highway system and then proceeded to neglect its passenger and freight rail systems. This was no accident. The American automotive industry worked with the US Federal government to advance driving and succeeded through the installation of facilitating infrastructure. This legacy is part of the challenge the United States faces today.

When politicians around the world talk about infrastructure, they usually mention roads and bridges: two favourites. And their public understands this. These are highly visible and understandable. But do we need more roads and bridges? Probably the opposite, at least in the developed world.

To address climate change we will need more and better mass transit to get people out of their cars and to encourage greater population density in urban areas to reduce the distance people need to travel to work. This will require more urban infrastructure such as municipal water, urban parks and recreation, and cultural centres such as museums to improve the quality of urban life.

Sources: Wikipedia, US Bureau of Transportation Statistics, World Bank, Amtrak
Image: Yonah Freemark

 

Energy production and consumption are, of course, central issues in the climate change discussion, but the alternatives are used as soundbites and the true underlying issue is lost. The production and consumption of energy is driven by a global infrastructure that supports it. Change the infrastructure and that will all change.

The most obvious subject, and the usual soundbite, is renewable energy: wind and solar, versus fossil fuel. This is true enough but regardless of how many solar farms are built, or rooftop panels are installed, until large nations build transmission lines to carry that power to its users and install smart grid technology to allow for distributed rooftop installations to integrate with its grids, we will never get there.

Similarly, no matter how fancy and/or inexpensive electric cars become, they will not be more than an oddity until there are high speed charging stations throughout the road systems of the most populous nations and all over every densely populated area to support their use.

[ads1]

 

Carbon capture is another area where infrastructure will make a difference, collecting CO2 produced by industries such as manufacturing, steel production, and chemicals, including fertilizers for agricultural use, and injecting them into deep aquifers in the earth. To accomplish this at scale will require vast systems of pipelines and storage areas. Without carbon capture, regardless of how we produce and consume energy, we will never approach zero emissions.

The responses to climate change and the issue of infrastructure do not overlap 100%. In addition to carbon pricing, research and development will play a big role in addressing climate change. There are also standalone infrastructure needs like drinkable water that are separate from climate change. But the overlap is so great that it’s absurd to be thinking of these issues as distinct.

Furthermore, coming at infrastructure from the perspective of climate change provides the most needed element in the infrastructure debate: a policy purpose. Just saying “more” is worse than insufficient. When it suggests more of the same, it’s simply wrong.

Coming at the climate change discussion from the perspective of infrastructure moves the discussion away from questions of personal choice and brings into focus the fact that massive government action is what is required. Addressing climate change is not like getting people to stop littering. It’s about a massive global government-driven modification to the way we all live. It is largely about the infrastructure we will build.

[box type=”note” align=”” class=”” width=””]Written by

Joel Moser, Founder and CEO, Aquamarine Investment Partners

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.[/box]

climate Freight infrastructure transportation
Previous ArticleHow an AI trained to read scientific papers could predict future discoveries
Next Article An increasing number of countries are banning e-cigarettes – here’s why
AdminPAGE
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

(PAGE) is the leading weekly financial magazine of the country for nearly 40 years. It is read widely both nationally and internationally for its coverage of various topics and investigative reporting by the business community, members of the Karachi, Lahore and Islamabad stock exchanges, members of different chambers of commerce and industry, governments officials, professionals, bankers, students and is also subscribed by major libraries around the world.

Related Posts

Green logistics out in the cold

May 22, 2023

Efficient logistics vital for economic growth

May 22, 2023

Ride-hailing apps help grow logistics, transportation

May 22, 2023

Leave A Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

subsfwebfinal
ADVERTISEMENT RATE CARD
Haier
ADVERTISEMENTS THIS WEEK
PAGE Annual 2022
blog-bannernew
tourism-bannernew
Previous Editions
© 2023 Designed & Developed By Pakistan & Gulf Economist.
  • Digital Edition
  • Print Edition
  • Print + Digital Edition
  • PDF Edition

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Go to mobile version